貼圖、程式等,版主可任意修改或刪除,轉貼文章請多用連結,一天 (00:00-23:59) 請只開一個話題,請大家合作,謝謝。05/19/2024 07:06:56     意見庫存
 

外獨會意見交流

 

佔領國未必要給當地住民國籍(如美國若占領台灣,未必給台灣人其國籍)

發言人:主權公民Gunner, on Apr/25/2024    07:40:56 (IP code: X.X.218.247)
 主題:選擇國籍的制度,仍未確立為習慣國際法;佔領國未必要給當地住民國籍

東京高等法院,1980年6月12日
TOKYO HIGH COURT, JUNE 12, 1980

(東京地方法院上訴,1977年4月27日判決
Appeal from Tokyo District Court, Judgment of April 27, 1977.)

法院意見
OPINION OF THE COURT
2.
(7)第3段地2句:

選擇國籍的制度,
The institution of selection of nationality,

即在沒有任何規定的情況下自然承認割讓領土上的居民的權利,
in the sense that the right of inhabitants in ceded territory is naturally recognized without any provision about it,

仍然沒有確立為習慣國際法 。
is still not established as customary international law.

通順講:

選擇國籍的制度—即在沒有任何規定的情況下自然承認割讓領土上的居民的權利—仍然沒有確立為習慣國際法。


資料來源:

日本東京高等法院 1980/06/12 駁回台人提告日本國籍上訴案;重點節錄,谷歌翻譯

Tokyo High Court, 1980 https://www.taiwanbasic.com/insular/tokyo-1980.htm

==========================================================================================

不是美國占領台灣,台灣人就會取得美國籍。

一旦撤軍,上世紀的越南,這世紀的阿富汗都是教訓。

蜜月期間,美國當然要你100%服從;但大難來時,保衛國家絕對是你自己的責任。

台灣應以民主為軟實力,帶領全球華人加入民主陣營,提升在盟邦地位,使中共不敢從事軍事冒險才是王道。

==========================================================================================

170 頁 日本國際法年鑑 [第 25 冊、1982 年]補原址缺失177頁下半-178頁開頭


另外,必須說明的是,《世界人權宣言》只是製定法律和締結條約時的指導原則,
Besides, it must be construed that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is only a guiding principle at the time of enactment of laws and conclusion of treaties,
其規定不具有直接影響力私人國籍的取得和喪失。
and the provisions of this do not have direct influence upon the acquisition and loss of nationality of private individuals.

(七)推進自願入籍原則。
(7) The principle of voluntary nationality, as it is called, is advanced.
根據該規定,改變國籍應服從個人的自由意志,未經本人同意,任何人不得改變國籍。
According to this, change of nationality shall be subject to the free will on individuals and no one shall have his nationality changed without his own consent.

然而,關於領土讓與對被割讓領土上居民國籍的影響,國際法原則仍然是,領土居民因割讓而自然獲得被割讓者國籍。
However, with regard to the influence of a concession of territory upon the nationality of inhabitants in that ceded territory, it is still the principle of international law that as a result of a concession of territory inhabitants there naturally acquire the nationality of the cede.

為了緩和上述原則,現代條約的先例中已廣泛實行了選擇國籍的製度(在日本,自1875年5月7日《日俄割讓條約》以來,選擇國籍已無一例外地得到承認),但這只是條約的指導原則。
The institution of selection of nationality has been widely put into practice in the precedents of modern treaties in order to moderate the above principle (in Japan, since the Treaty for the Mutual Cession of Territory between Japan and Russia, May 7, 1875, the right to select one’s nationality has been recognized without exception), but this is only a guiding principle for treaties.
選擇國籍的製度,即割讓領土上的居民的權利在沒有任何規定的情況下自然得到承認,仍然沒有確立為習慣國際法。
The institution of selection of nationality, in the sense that the right of inhabitants in ceded territory is naturally recognized without any provision about it, is still not established as customary international law.
 

Record ID: 1714002056   From: 台灣瀏覽整個話題

本篇到此告一段落———版主

WE ARE 49ER TAIWANESE