| 貼圖、程式等，版主可任意修改或刪除，轉貼文章請多用連結，一天 (00:00-23:59) 請只開一個話題，請大家合作，謝謝。05/18/2024 22:50:20 意見庫存 |
外獨會意見交流 |
||
|---|---|---|
| 為何無日本歸還台灣給中華民國雙方簽字用印的條約 |
| 資料來源:日本東京最高法院駁回台人提告日本國籍案，判決文，法院意見2.(7)最後1段。
在我們之前的例子中，日本沒有給台灣居民選擇國籍的機會。 In the case before us,Japan did not afford inhabitants of Taiwan an opportunity to select their nationality. 但中華民國，也就是所謂的割讓者，頒布了一項尊重台灣居民恢復國籍的法律。 But the Republic of China,or the ceder, as it is called, promulgated a law respecting the regaining of her nationality by the inhabitants in Taiwan. 本法規定不願恢復中華民國國籍者，有一定期限適用。 In this law a period is provided for those who do not wish to regain Republic of China nationality to apply to that effect. 因此，日本或割讓國能否在日本與中華民國和平條約簽訂時提出選擇國籍的建議是值得懷疑的。 Therefore, it is doubtful whether Japan, or the ceder, could propose the selection of nationality at the time of the Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of China. 假設這樣的主張是可取的，從上述說法來看，台灣居民喪失日本國籍的事實仍然不存在法律缺陷。 Supposing that such a proposition was desirable, apparently from the statement above, there is still no legal defect in the fact that inhabitants of Taiwan lost their Japanese nationality. |
| Record ID: 1713830205R013 | From: 台灣 | 瀏覽整個話題 |