| 貼圖、程式等，版主可任意修改或刪除，轉貼文章請多用連結，一天 (00:00-23:59) 請只開一個話題，請大家合作，謝謝。05/19/2024 02:39:08 意見庫存 |
外獨會意見交流 |
||
|---|---|---|
| 中共為何咬著台灣(現行國號中華民國)不放 |
| 主權公民Gunner, on Apr/20/2024 22:26:57 (IP code: X.X.153.55)
>> 010 中華民國強迫粗心的台灣人獲得公民身份 台灣人的日本國籍是屬地主義(哈屁可能了解有困難)，台灣脫離日本殖民，台灣人也失去日本國籍。 所以日本恢復主權之前，台灣人若不恢復中華民國籍便無國籍；其以放棄台灣恢復主權，台灣人也仍無其國籍。 有人就是信以為真，跑去日本告洋狀被駁回 Tokyo High Court, 1980 。 哈屁，罄竹難書。 貼文前應該查證。 不是東剪西貼，既無知也不負責。 我以後看到你，還是算了，反正你也不會進步。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 國際主權國家，誰認同? 我貼全文上來~你繼續狡辯~呸! 不要臉西老搞壞咪阿 ROC forced citizenship on unwary Taiwanese https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2011/01/20/2003493942 The Treaty of Shimonoseki was signed on April 17, 1895, in the Japanese city that lends the treaty its name. It came into effect on May 8 that same year. According to the treaty, Taiwan belonged to Japan, but people living in Taiwan were given the opportunity to choose their nationality by either leaving or staying within two years of the treaty being signed. This ability to choose one’s own nationality is a basic human right. In the book On Taiwan’s Status and Relations, edited by National Chengchi University history professor Hsueh Hua-yuan (薛化元), it says that the Republic of China (ROC) government announced in January 1946 that the people living in Taiwan had “regained” their status as ROC nationals, which gave rise to diplomatic protests from the UK and the US. Wang Shih-Chieh (王世杰), who was then minister of foreign affairs, also mentioned this event in a letter to Huang Kuo-shu (黃國書), a Taiwanese legislator at the time. In the same book, it is stated that the Taiwan Provincial Administrative Executive Office said on Jan. 20, 1946, that the people of Taiwan Province had their Chinese nationality restored as of Oct. 25, 1945, according to an order by the Executive Yuan on Jan. 12, 1946. The UK foreign ministry sent a communique to the ROC embassy in London on Aug. 31, 1946, saying that although it conceded that Taiwan was under the control of the ROC government, London regretted that it could not accept that Taiwanese had already had their Chinese nationality restored, according to A New Discourse on Taiwan’s Status by former Academia Historica president Lin Man-houng (林滿紅). In a thesis about the peace treaty, Lin said that the US State Department in a November 1946 memorandum to the ROC government said that it was in full agreement with the UK’s position on this matter. Official documents from April 19, 1952, that the Japanese government made public said that Taiwanese were to lose their Japanese nationality as soon as the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty — commonly known as the Treaty of Taipei, which did not enter into force until Aug. 5, 1952 — took effect. Clearly, then, the Taiwanese were forced to accept ROC nationality before the peace treaty had even come into effect. This was not only absurd and unreasonable, it was also in violation of international law. Former foreign minister George Yeh (葉公超) made an additional remark to the legislature in July 1952 on the Treaty of Taipei: He said that Article 10 of the treaty — on the legal status of the people in Taiwan and Penghu — was not mentioned in the Treaty of San Francisco, but that is was of great importance to the people of Taiwan. Imposing ROC nationality on Taiwanese without asking their prior consent and without giving them a choice in the matter is clearly in contravention of international legal principles and was done seven years before the Treaty of Taipei was ratified. Chen Yi-nan is vice convener of Taiwan Society North’s science and technology subcommittee. gunner支那老婊子你愛台灣，我看是愛台灣退休俸吧，呸~不要臉西老搞壞咪阿 |
| Record ID: 1713657080R059 | From: 不詳 | 瀏覽整個話題 |